> So we need answers from DRLVM and jchevm guys...
Archie has expressed the jchevm opinion in favour of the change --
anyone familiar with DRLVM care to comment?
(Of course this would be after Geir's VM build work, just asking)
Regards,
Tim
DRLVM needs some (minor) changes to support 1.5-targeted classfiles,
this is quite easy. Full-fledged implementation of 1.5 kernel classes
(annotations, reflection, etc) requires some more efforts but also
should not take too long.
So +1 from me.
Regards,
Alexey Varlamov
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
