Alexey Varlamov wrote: >> > So we need answers from DRLVM and jchevm guys... >> >> Archie has expressed the jchevm opinion in favour of the change -- >> anyone familiar with DRLVM care to comment? >> >> (Of course this would be after Geir's VM build work, just asking) >> >> Regards, >> Tim > > DRLVM needs some (minor) changes to support 1.5-targeted classfiles, > this is quite easy. Full-fledged implementation of 1.5 kernel classes > (annotations, reflection, etc) requires some more efforts but also > should not take too long.
Understood, I wasn't expecting those to be working -- just the effort to let DRLVM grok the v49 files. > So +1 from me. Well it isn't a formal vote, but glad to see you are in favor too. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
