Paulex Yang wrote: > Stepan Mishura wrote: >> On 6/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Mikhail Loenko wrote: >>> > I think it should be there. As I remember Mark added it there after >>> > build failures. >>> > Old files could make the build mistakenly passing. >>> >>> I don't understand. >>> >>> What prevents someone from doing >>> >>> $ ant clean; ant; >>> >>> to solve that? >> >> >> Then we have to perform "clean" explicitly each time that seems for me >> annoying too. >> >> I was OK with "clean" as a default action. > So do we have the choice not to clean when running the script manually?
yes - you have to type "ant build" or something. I've never seen a default "clean" before, which is why I find it annoying :) geir >> >> Thanks, >> Stepan. >> >> geir >>> >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Mikhail >>> > >>> > 2006/6/16, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >> I hope that no one really is bothered by that. It's just so annoying >>> :) >>> >> >>> >> If you are, feel free to put it back (or I will ) and then lets >>> discuss? >>> >> >>> >> geir >>> >> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
