Nikolay Kuznetsov wrote:
Richard,
We have two issues here:
[688] java.util.regex.Matcher does not support Unicode supplementary
characters
[696] Harmony regex does not support Character.isXXX character classes
I would prefer, if you don't mind, to fix them separately. I know that
supplementary character support is a tricky thing and will take some
time while {javaXXXX} char. classes could be fixed relatively
quick(w/o supplementary character support).
I agree. Nik.
And I have a question, am I right that supplementary character affects
mostly ranges and character classes all the other constructs will work
fine w/o special processing, what do you think.
Unfortunately, I can provide some test cases to demonstrate other
constructs, such as X{n}, DO support supplementary characters. But I'm
not sure if other constructs need special processing. Thanks a lot.
Thank you.
Nik.
On 6/29/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Nik,
Just a kind reminder, as you may already know, a set of new isXXXX
methods have been defined since Java 1.5 which have a int (codepoint)
parameter. This may make things tricky. ;-)
Best regards,
Richard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Richard Liang
China Software Development Lab, IBM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
