> -----Original Message----- > From: Geir Magnusson Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Maven layout"? We were doing that layout in Jakarta projects long > before maven.... >
And I would guess the Maven designers would agree. Much of their documentation talks about how the conventions inferred in the "super" POMs came from Jakarta projects and others. > This is a fun thread. I plan to read it from end to end later today and > comment. > > Initial thoughts are that I've been wanting to use TestNG for months > (hence my resistance to any JUnit deps more than we needed to) and > second, annotations won't solve our problems. More later :) > I find this to be an extremely interesting comment. What value do you see TestNG offering? Most of the conversations pushing for TestNG as a solution have been all about the annotations. > geir > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
