Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > I don't know if this is being considered, but > > 1) Classlib has lots of java internationalization needs, and some native > internationalization needs > > 2) DRLVM has lots of native internationalization needs, and some java > needs (kernel classes).
FWIW, I as far as I can figure from both [drlvm] and [classlib] discussions, the topic is *localization*, i.e. providing the user with the messages in native language of the user. Concerning *internationalization* Java code is internationalized by design, and DRLVM needs some fixes to achieve it, at least * accept non-ascii class names in locale-specific encoding For more information about "i18n vs l10n", see http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-i18n --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
