Alexey Petrenko wrote: > There are not much news to share... > > First of all I realized that I did not completely build Yoko. My build > was failed with the test failure. I thought that all the tests are at > the end so all the sources are built. But Yoko runs the tests after > building each module... > I reviewed Yoko bug database and found the issue corresponding to my > failure, applied fix to my repository and definitely finished the > build after that :)
Ok. > > I've tried to run Maven on Harmony classlib+drlvm but have failed with > it. Ant lets to define Java executable to run on by environment > variable but I could not find such option for Maven. I've renamed > ij.exe into java.exe and set JAVA_HOME to drlvm location. Maven > started with Harmony after that but failed with Java version check. > Drlvm shows version like 11.smth.smth. > Probably we should fix this in drlvm. Or at least discuss this. Both are fixed in current version, or should be if it's just using the first line reported by "-versin" > > I also found a shell script inside Yoko which can run Yoko tests > without Maven. But I had not time to try it yet... > Ok - I don't understand quite what you are trying to do. The goal is to integrate yoko to satisfy the corba requirements for java 5. it sounds like you are trying to run Yoko using Harmony. This is something that will happen, but w/o any integration into classlib, right now no one can look at this with you. Can you come up with a first-pass, simple, just-get-it-in-there integration into the classlibrary? geir > SY, Alexey > > 2006/7/21, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> So how goes the YOKO battle? >> >> Alexey Petrenko wrote: >> > Guys, >> > >> > There is a CORBA implementation in Apache incubator named Yoko. >> > http://incubator.apache.org/yoko/ >> > >> > I've built and reviewed it... It seems that Yoko have almost all the >> > packages from the 1.5 specification. >> > So it looks like a good candidate for using as CORBA for Harmony. >> > >> > The only problem is that Yoko has even more packages in org.omg then >> > specified by 1.5 specification. So we should decide what to do with >> > them. >> > >> > I'm planing to do the following things in nearest future: >> > 1. Get the list of the not implemented classes in Yoko according to 1.5 >> > spec. >> > 2. Check that we have all the classes needed by Yoko in Harmony. >> > >> > Thoughts? Comments? >> > >> > SY, Alexey >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
