I concur. We should not have any sun.* packages. Any program that explicitly depends on a sun.* class should fail.
Alex. On 08/08/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure it's legal to put any classes to sun.* packages Opinions? Thanks, Mikhail 2006/8/8, Martín Córdova (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HARMONY-1088 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1088 > Project: Harmony > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: Windows XP SP2 latest Harmony JRE as of aug-8-2006 > Reporter: Martín Córdova > > > Harmony does not include this class. It's not a standard class, but has been of common usage for many years, and most JDKs (Sun, IBM and BEA) provide it under the SAME package. I think that there is no sense in not providing it under the usual package, it just breaks existing code. > > BTW, this JRE is seems to be running real fast. > > > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa > - > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
