Hi Andrew,
It seems a big problem to me. :) I haven't find any solution yet. Futhurmore, ftp server also needs to be substituted. Do you have any suggestions?
No! This is why I have asked you :) Have you heard about Apache FTP server [1]? Just found this in Google. It has the right words in the description: "The Apache FTP Server is a 100% pure Java FTP server." [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ftpserver/ Regards, 2006/8/8, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexei, sorry for my late reply. It seems a big problem to me. :) I haven't find any solution yet. Futhurmore, ftp server also needs to be substituted. Do you have any suggestions? Anyway, let's start from http server -- jetty. :) Any committers would like to integrate jetty to Harmony? Thanks! On 8/1/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > I volunteer to work on excluded tests in luni module, most of which are > > dependent on external servers(http server, socks proxy and etc.). > > Great news - go ahead! :) > What are you going to use as a substitute for the remote socks proxy? > > Regards, > > 2006/8/1, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi folks, > > > > I volunteer to work on excluded tests in luni module, most of which are > > dependent on external servers(http server, socks proxy and etc.). > > > > As we discussed some months earlier, we'd integrate Jetty to Harmony > test > > framework for eliminating external http server, but seems no more > progress. > > > > Any volunteer to do this job? :-) > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > On 5/23/06, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi George, Paulex, > > > > > > Thanks for your answers. As a preliminary result - your convinced me > and > > > I'm > > > going to be volunteer to evaluate jetty integration to classlib test > > > suite. > > > > > > Do anybody work on integrating jetty http server to move net tests out > of > > > exclude list? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Stepan. > > > > > > On 5/23/06, George Harley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > > > Hi George, Tim > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to clarify the following questions: > > > > > 1) Configuring > > > > > As I understood we say that the server is 'embedded' when we can > > > > > start/stop > > > > > it within Ant without additional configuration steps. And all we > need > > > > > to do > > > > > is just download required jars. Right? > > > > > > > > > > What about Eclipse users? > > > > > > > > Hi Stepan, > > > > > > > > In addition to be being start-able, stop-able and configurable from > Ant > > > > and XML config files, Jetty can also be embedded into the Java code > of a > > > > test case or test suite. Configuration, starting and stopping are > all > > > > possible. Eclipse users should not be disadvantaged. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) Time to run test suite > > > > > May be it is hard to estimate but anyway - will the test suite run > > > > > slow down > > > > > if we'll use jetty instead of mock objects? How much? > > > > > > > > Depends on configuration. Configure and start the server in the > setup() > > > > of a JUnit TesCase (and stopping the server in the teardown()) would > > > > obviously be slower than doing the equivalent in a JUnit TestSetup > > > > descendent. Start up is a lot less than half a second on my machine. > > > > > > > > Is there some performance benchmark for tests that is at risk here ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Testing > > > > > Quoting Tim from 'local server thread': "There is no way to force > a > > > > > server > > > > > to send you a chunked response using regular HTTP headers, so in > this > > > > > case > > > > > the server and client have an understanding that when the client > asks > > > > > for a > > > > > particular resource the server will send it back in chunks." > > > > > > > > > > With mock objects this can be done with no problems and > HARMONY-164 > > > > > demonstrates the possible way. Also are we going to create > negative > > > > > tests, > > > > > for example, for broken server response? I think yes. Can jetty > server > > > > be > > > > > used for negative testing? > > > > > > > > Yes. You can send back any error. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > See other comments below > > > > > > > > > > On 5/22/06, George Harley wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > > >> > On 5/19/06, Tim Ellison wrote: > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > > >> >> <snip> > > > > >> >> > I'm OK only if we separate tests with Jetty from common test > > > suite > > > > >> >> run. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> Why? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Because each external dependency complicates 'normal' test > suite > > > > >> run ( I > > > > >> > don't want to face with situation when to run Harmony test > suite I > > > > >> > have to > > > > >> > configure and run 20 different external servers even they are > easy > > > > >> > configurable). As far as I remember we agreed to use mock > objects - > > > > so > > > > >> > let's > > > > >> > use them! For example, in this case there is no need in jetty > > > server. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I'm not against 'jetty based tests' but I'd prefer to separate > such > > > > >> > tests. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > > >> > Stepan. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> Hi Stepan, > > > > >> > > > > >> Just seen this note and think that my previous append on the "Re: > svn > > > > >> commit: r407752" thread sums up my thoughts. Allow me to quote > > > myself: > > > > >> > > > > >> <paste> > > > > >> Jetty or equivalent is a good basis for such local server stubs. > It > > > is > > > > >> fast, it is lightweight, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fast and lightweight as what? > > > > > I saw sometimes ago java server that has jar size 4k. And > > > > > jetty-6.0.0beta6.jar is 423k size. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not sure of your point here. Is there some test file footprint > benchmark > > > > that is at risk here ? If there is a better, faster, more > lightweight > > > > server that would suit our purposes then let's hear about it so that > we > > > > can investigate whether or not it may be used with our network > tests. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> it can be started and stopped very simply from > > > > >> within Ant (so that it only runs for the duration of a specified > > > batch > > > > >> of unit tests) and may also be completely controlled from Java > test > > > > code > > > > >> so that we can configure its behaviour for any test case from > within > > > > >> that test case. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good. > > > > > > > > > > It's architecture means that we do not have to run it as > > > > >> a complete web server but can stub out any aspect of its runtime > > > > >> behaviour we wish in order to suit the purposes of the test(s). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What about 'chunked response'? Can a testcase force jetty server > to > > > > > send it > > > > > a chunked response? > > > > > > > > Yes. The API provides options to do this. Chunks are encoded as per > > > > RFC2616. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > George > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't really understand why such network tests making use of a > > > small, > > > > >> embedded server running locally would need to be considered as > > > outside > > > > >> of the "normal test flow". > > > > >> </paste> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because I consider adding jetty server as precedent for adding > other > > > > > dependencies to the "normal test flow". I believe that "normal > test > > > > flow" > > > > > should be fast and lightweight as much as possible. Each > additional > > > > > dependency or configuration step adds a brick(even it light) to > > > > > developer's > > > > > large. As the result classlib test suite may become very slow and > hard > > > > to > > > > > configure. All I want is to understand - do we really need jetty > > > server > > > > > inside it. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Stepan. > > > > > > > > > > We are not talking about an external server here and we are not > > > talking > > > > >> about developers having to carry out complex configuration > manoeuvres > > > > >> when running the tests. That is something that nobody wants. The > > > > >> motivation here is purely to get more of the java.net tests out > of > > > the > > > > >> "excludes" sin bin. > > > > >> > > > > >> Best regards, > > > > >> George > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > Regards, > > > > >> >> Tim > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> -- > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > >> >> IBM Java technology centre, UK. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >> >> Terms of use : > http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > > > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > Stepan Mishura > > > Intel Middleware Products Division > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrew Zhang > > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > > > > > > -- > Alexei Zakharov, > Intel Middleware Product Division > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Andrew Zhang China Software Development Lab, IBM
-- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Middleware Product Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
