On Sep 21, 2006, at 1:42 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 9/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that would work, but again, it takes away the simplicity of never
having to think about it - what you see locally is what you get when
you deploy, which is a really, really good QA benefit.
the other problem with relativised urls is that local links don't
work. this makes it difficult to test links locally.
Right - up to now, our site was completely testable locally. That's
the major benefit of using this system.
using the absolute URL for the style works except when you want to
edit the style sheet.
i've been trying to find a good solution to relatized URLs for a
while. having a switch means there's a risk of committing the local
only files.
yep
what would be good is a browser where it's possible to set the base
URL for local files. anyone know one?
There's no reason to worry about this here. if we just use a
site.css in each directory, I think we're ok.
geir
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
