On 10/3/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Serguei Zapreyev wrote: > Dear committers, > > > > I filed recently the HARMONY-1573, -1650, -1651, -1654 issues with the > suggested patches. I was looking at 1573 last night, but was too tired to follow the instructions :) (Take the third attachment, combine with the first, to produce the second test that can be used on any Thursday in an odd-numbered month. Carry the 7, cross out each second vowel, and ...)
Sorry. I'll try to avoid such cases in the future. Yes, I'll look at all three today. the last three were hidden - you
didn't assign to the DRLVM component, so I missed them yesterday. > > So, to avoid redoubling efforts or superposition of commits because of > delay > > could somebody take them under a control to estimate and apply if it is > necessary? > > All the more, the 1650 and 1573 issues seem to be able to upset somehow the > execution stability of a big > > application. Does that mean the patches fix them, or make big apps less stable?
Yes, of course, I meant the patches fix them. Thanks, Serguei geir
> > > > Great thanks in advance, > > Serguei > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Thanks, Serguei
