Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> +1
>
> BTW, why call it "RepositionLock"?
That was just an example taken from the class I was looking at, I've
called them different names depending upon the inst var name.
Tim
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> BTW, as I go through the code looking at the occurrences of 'new
>> Object()' and determining if they are used simply for their locks, I
>> figured we also need a way to record the check has been done.
>>
>> So, if there is a 'new Object()' that is not simply a lock object (and
>> therefore named as we agreed) I'll mark it on the same line as
>> // $NON-LOCK-1$ so we can easily grep for divergences from the pattern.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>> Mikhail Fursov wrote:
>>> Another variant is to use anonymous class without the name:
>>> Object lock = new Object(){};
>>>
>>> But the name by itself (RepositionLock) serves like a comment.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/3/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> private class RepositionLock {}
>>>> private Object repositionLock = new RepositionLock();
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
