On the 0x206 day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Fursov wrote: > On 10/18/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > And we need some criteria to define how #1 could become #3 > > > Healthy community? > + Do we need some criteria to define how #3 could become #1 ?
why not? what is so unhealthy in throwing some garbage away? :) Seriously, criteria for supporting could be something like: "if there is always someone working to repair that platform when it is broken, we support it, otherwise we cannot afford that platform". That's a kind of "slow support". I'd also suggest to find a small set of "fast support" platforms, fixing them is first priority for all of us. It makes a guaranteed build/run/tests at (almost) each moment in time. Does it make sense? -- Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
