On the 0x20E day of Apache Harmony Stepan Mishura wrote: > On 26 Oct 2006 10:49:10 +0700, Egor Pasko wrote: > > > > On the 0x20D day of Apache Harmony Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > On 10/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > > > > > We're a volunteer project, so "supported" is based on interest in > > > > community. Lets be clear by writing down a set of platforms that we > > as > > > > a community commit to support. > > > > > > > > I think we can define "support" as - "one or more people in the > > > > community tests on that platform on a regular basis, there are users > > > > that use that platform, and we have people volunteering to find and > > fix > > > > bugs that specifically affect that platform" > > > > > > > > Just throw things out there and we'll gather the results and see > > what's > > > > popular. We'll summarize in 3 days. Please be clear in indicating > > what > > > > you think should be reported. Don't vote against anything. To start, > > > > using a broad brush : > > > > > > > > > Geir, > > > > > > I'd like to summarize the discussion to put the summary to web-site. I'm > > > going to add something like: "We aimed to support wide range of > > different > > > platforms. The main criteria if platform is supported or not is that > > there > > > are people interesting in running test on regular base, reporting build > > > status, finding and fixing bugs for that platform. A list of currently > > > supported platforms can be found at > > > http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Platforms_to_Run_VM_on. " > > > > Stepan, that's "HDK runs on the following platforms". > > DRLVM guys do not use HDK (correct me here). So, I was expecting to > > see: "Harmony (DRLVM) builds and runs on the following platforms". > > > > "Runs" is something more common than "builds", and we want "builds" :) > > So, we still mean different things when we say "supported". (not my > > fav. word) > > > > Does it make sense to create a separate page for that or enhance the > > existing one? Or, maybe, it does not make sense at all? ;o) > > > > IMO, it makes sense to fix results of the discussion. From my POV the main > point is how we define "support" and what it means for us. After we agree on > that we can move to details.
OK, let's somehow fix the results! -- Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division
