-----Original Message----- From: Pavel Ozhdikhin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:18 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [drlvm][test]Exclude some tests from "build test" target, make 'build test' pass
On 10/26/06, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 25 October 2006 21:05 Rana Dasgupta wrote: > > The ideal way would be for acceptance tests like "build test" to always > > pass and to catch and roll back the patch that breaks this invariant, > > rather than to disable the tests. But I agree with Vera, it is important > to > > keep a running set up as acceptance tests, so disabling the well known > > failures may be the only way until we fix the problems. > > > > I don't know that any of the tests are "unstable". These are > implementation > > bugs. gc.LOS is a bug in thread yielding by the apr Windows > functionality. > > The java.lang.ObjectTest also looks like an interpreter implementation > > error. > > I wonder about gc.LOS, I remember there was a discussion, and I think > there > were patches too. But I cannot find any right now. Were there any fixes to > the problem which made gc.LOS to work on WinXP? This is Harmony-1933 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1933> issue and it still lacks a patch. Thanks, Pavel Hmm and java.lang.ObjectTest works for me both on windows and linux... > > -- > Gregory Shimansky, Intel Middleware Products Division > Pavel, test java.lang.ObjectTest fails very seldom. I checked it on Win XP, ia32, interpreter, release configuration. It didn't fail yesterday 25 October, but it failed 24 October (vm revision: 467401 classlib revision: 467390) and about a week ago, so it's unstable.
