No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking about require that methods add this exception to the signature to actually show up in the reports?
On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stuart Ballard wrote: > Tim Ellison wrote: >> I'm no fan of stubs for just such reason. But for those dev's that are >> following along, there is an >> org.apache.harmony.luni.util.NotYetImplementedException that is defined >> for just such purposes. > > Would you consider renaming this to NotImplementedException since Japi > recognizes that name in throws clauses and treats it specially? > > If you feel strongly about not changing the existing name, I can add > NotYetImplementedException as an alternative hardcoded name in > Japitools but that seems kinda redundant... > > What do you think? I have no objection to renaming it. If nobody objects in the next day or so then I'll go ahead and do it. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
