Cool, just making sure. Excuse my obvious questions. :)
-Nathan On 11/9/06, Stuart Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote: > No problem on the name change, but doesn't what Stuart is talking > about require that methods add this exception to the signature to > actually show up in the reports? That's correct. If it's a subclass of RuntimeException (which it ought to be, otherwise it'd have to be in throws clauses anyway and that'd show up as errors already) it makes no practical difference to have it in the throws clause, but it provides a useful way to flag stub methods in such a way that Japitools can detect them. But yes, you have to do the work by hand to actually mark the stubs by setting the throws clause accordingly. Stuart. -- http://sab39.dev.netreach.com/
