I have added an updated patch to Harmony-2009. Please let me know any comments on the changes. The DRLVM section is quite small at the moment as I haven't done any work with DRLVM myself, so if I've missed any steps please let me know about that too.
Thanks, Sian On 09/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Egor Pasko wrote: > On the 0x21C day of Apache Harmony Sian January wrote: >> Hello again, >> >> I have had a closer look at the "Developing Apache Harmony Class-library >> Code with Eclipse" page, and I have noticed that the "Configuring Eclipse" >> and "Develop and Test Code" sections are quite class-library specific. >> Would it be better to leave those sections as they are and add a "Developing >> DRLVM with Eclipse" section on the same page? > > To the moment I am not aware of anybody who would use Eclipse for > DRLVM development. So, it's too early to add a page like this. This will ensure that no one does then - if it's simple to add, lets add it... geir > >> Thanks, >> >> Sian >> >> >> >> On 07/11/06, Konovalova, Svetlana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Sian, >>> Sorry for delay in response. >>>> I'd like to help with documentation but I don't want to duplicate any >>> work >>>> that you are in the middle of, so let me know if there's anything >>> specific >I can do... >>> Thanks for your desire to help! >>> Well, let's work at the page "Developing Apache Harmony Class-library >>> Code with Eclipse" >>> [ http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/dev_ecli >>> pse.html] first, if you do not mind. >>> AFAIK the majority of items on the page can equally apply to DRLVM and >>> classlib. IMHO would be great to edit the page to remove unnecessary >>> focus on classlib, to make the page equally relevant for vm developers. >>> To my mind, the introductory sections should be removed, as they are >>> about generalities that do not always relate to the header of the page. >>> Could you please take a close look at the page and create the patch to >>> improve the content and to remove all classlib-specific info? You can >>> use Harmony-2009 for it. It would be a great impact into development of >>> the site documentation for sure! If you need my help, just let me know. >>> The second idea is to move the page up, not to store it in >>> subcomponents/classlib. To make it easily accessible, we can store it in >>> top xdocs folder and link to the page from documentation.html, quick >>> helps and other build-development web pages. >>> If you do not have any objections, I can create a patch with the >>> necessary links. >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Sveta >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Sian January [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 2:23 PM >>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [build] Building on Eclipse - FYI >>> >>> Hi Sveta, >>> >>> Thanks for all your work on this. I think you're right about the >>> Eclipse >>> information - I think most of it is fairly generic and it would be good >>> to >>> have it in the "Project Documentation" section. I believe the new >>> details >>> about the ecj jar and the PDE-related settings are classlib-specific (- >>> Dpde.jreProfile=none etc), but that could probably be mentioned in the >>> document. >>> >>> I'd like to help with documentation but I don't want to duplicate any >>> work >>> that you are in the middle of, so let me know if there's anything >>> specific I >>> can do, or if you're nearly finished then I can leave this area to you >>> and >>> get involved in the future. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Sian >>> >>> On 31/10/06, Konovalova, Svetlana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Sian, >>>> >>>> Thank you so much for your positive feedback and appreciating the >>> page. >>>> This page is only related to classlib. But IMHO many of the things are >>>> pretty generic, and with minimal edits can be fit >>>> for VM as well. I suggest that we move this doc up to make it more >>>> visible and edit it so as to apply to the whole project, rather than >>> to >>>> classlib only. To my mind, the "Project Documentation" section is a >>> good >>>> place >>>> for this doc >>>> >>> [http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/documentation/documentation.html ]. >>>> How about that? >>>> >>>> As for the "GS with DRLVM" doc, it needs an update, and can be >>> abridged >>>> to reduce purely eclipse-oriented content. We can remove unnecessary >>>> screenshots as well. >>>> >>>> Feel free to take an active part in updating the doc, if you have time >>>> and desire :) >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Sveta >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Sian January [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 8:14 PM >>>> To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: [build] Building on Eclipse - FYI >>>> >>>> Hi Sveta, >>>> >>>> Thanks for doing that - I have had a look through your patch and it >>>> looks >>>> really good. >>>> >>>> Your suggestions for changes to the DRLVM document look good too. I >>>> couldn't really find any good links for getting started with Java >>>> programming in Eclipse on their website, the only thing that came >>> close >>>> was >>>> this - http://help.eclipse.org/help32/index.jsp, which has some >>> getting >>>> started tutorials within the page. There might be some better >>> articles >>>> out >>>> there on other sites though, or we could just direct people to the >>> help >>>> system or 'cheat sheets' within their Eclipse installation. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Sian >> >> >> -- >> Sian January >> >> IBM Java Technology Centre, UK >
-- Sian January IBM Java Technology Centre, UK
