Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > Gregory Shimansky wrote: >> On Saturday 11 November 2006 04:28 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>> Author: gshimansky >>>> Date: Fri Nov 10 16:17:50 2006 >>>> New Revision: 473588 >>>> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=473588 >>>> Log: >>>> Applied HARMONY-2152 [drlvm][em64t] build is broken after 1558 have >>>> been >>>> committed >>>> >>>> Since x86_64 is not yet fully supported and patch touched only x86_64 >>>> files no tests were ran. When I tried acceptance tests on em64t >>>> server I >>>> effectively shut it down. >>>> >>>> >>>> Modified: >>>> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag. >>>> >>>> h URL: >>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vm >>>> >>>> core/include/version_svn_tag.h?view=diff&rev=473588&r1=473587&r2=473588 >>>> ========================================================================= >>>> >>>> ===== --- >>>> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag. >>>> >>>> h (original) +++ >>>> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag. >>>> >>>> h Fri Nov 10 16:17:50 2006 @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ >>>> #ifndef _VERSION_SVN_TAG_ >>>> #define _VERSION_SVN_TAG_ >>>> >>>> -#define VERSION_SVN_TAG "473506" >>>> +#define VERSION_SVN_TAG "svn: This client is too old to work with >>>> working copy '.'; please get a newer Subversion client" >>> uh? >> >> Ok it seems like svn version on the x86_64 server was too old for the >> checked out repository. Don't worry, the version file will be fixed >> with a next commit to VM. >> >> It looks like we should really autogenerate it and remove it from svn >> as was suggested in another thread. >> > > It is autogenerated. We just need to stop committing it...
ehm, how about using svn:ignore then ;-) -- Stefano.
