Geir, Does SVN support some sort of exclude lists?
On 11/12/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote: > On Saturday 11 November 2006 04:28 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Author: gshimansky >>> Date: Fri Nov 10 16:17:50 2006 >>> New Revision: 473588 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=473588 >>> Log: >>> Applied HARMONY-2152 [drlvm][em64t] build is broken after 1558 have been >>> committed >>> >>> Since x86_64 is not yet fully supported and patch touched only x86_64 >>> files no tests were ran. When I tried acceptance tests on em64t server I >>> effectively shut it down. >>> >>> >>> Modified: >>> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag. >>> h URL: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vm >>> core/include/version_svn_tag.h?view=diff&rev=473588&r1=473587&r2=473588 >>> ========================================================================= >>> ===== --- >>> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag. >>> h (original) +++ >>> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag. >>> h Fri Nov 10 16:17:50 2006 @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@ >>> #ifndef _VERSION_SVN_TAG_ >>> #define _VERSION_SVN_TAG_ >>> >>> -#define VERSION_SVN_TAG "473506" >>> +#define VERSION_SVN_TAG "svn: This client is too old to work with >>> working copy '.'; please get a newer Subversion client" >> uh? > > Ok it seems like svn version on the x86_64 server was too old for the checked > out repository. Don't worry, the version file will be fixed with a next > commit to VM. > > It looks like we should really autogenerate it and remove it from svn as was > suggested in another thread. > It is autogenerated. We just need to stop committing it... geir
-- Pavel Pervov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
