Sorry, I can't use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail address.
Sorry again, to test it I use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] as for IBM notifications without ask for permission :( Could somebody register some fake mail address in the harmony-commits to use it for my CC notifications or I should use other alias or may be other options exist? Thanks, Vladimir By the way, now my CC reports for both systems: Unit Test Error Details: (1) Test: test_Sign Class: org.apache.harmony.xnet.tests.provider.jsse.DigitalSignatureTest junit.framework.AssertionFailedError at org.apache.harmony.xnet.tests.provider.jsse.DigitalSignatureTest.test_Sign( DigitalSignatureTest.java:135) at java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(Native Method) On 11/15/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
15.11.06, Gregory Shimansky<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> написал(а): > Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I started cruise control (stored in the "buildtest" module with patch from > > issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes. > > Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb HDD). > > > > On each platform cruise control runs (as separate projects in СС terms, all > > settings have default values): > > - build of classlib module (target: 'rebuild'); > > - classlib tests on J9 VM (target 'test' in the classlib module); > > - build of drlvm module (target: 'build'); > > - vm tests (kernel+smoke+cunit, target: 'test' in the drlvm module); > > - classlib tests on DRL VM (target: 'test' in the classlib module with - > > Dtest.jre.home=drlvm); > > > > Is it OK to send my cruise control notifications to the harmony-commits > > list > > in order to notify about regressions? > > > > I suspect the notifications are not ideal but I will work on their > > improvement upon precedents (false alarms) and your feedback > > I am +1 for cruise control and notifications to harmony-commit. > > But I wonder about linux version choice. If it is SuSE9, then could we > upgrade it to SuSE10 or install another distribution like FC5 with gcc > 4.1.x? This will help a lot with compilation errors which gcc 3.3.3 on > SuSE9 doesn't report. Good point, I support this. -- Alexey > > -- > Gregory > >
