Re: [general][testing] cruise control on the WinXP and SUSE linux

[Geir Magnusson Jr.]

Stepan Mishura wrote:

Vladimir,

Sorry, I didn't follow discussions about build-and-test infra. I've done
check out of build-and-test workspace and I'm trying to set up it. I
have some questions:
- README.txt file says about downloading IBM VME and I guess you run CC on
DRL VM. Does the file is up to date?

No - that was written before DRLVM could do this :)

- 'ant setup' fetches CruiseControl and sets it up. But why I should fetch
classlib dependencies manually? IMHO, 'ant setup' should do it too.

Again, early days... the patches should fix...

Thanks,
Stepan.

On 11/16/06, Vladimir Ivanov  wrote:

Thanks, today this test passed on both machines :( I hope, the CC will
send
notification if this test fail again.

Now, notifications should be sending to harmony-commits list from the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address.



Thanks, Vladimir

On 11/16/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:

> On 11/15/06, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, I can't use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail
> address.
> >
> > Sorry again, to test it I use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] as for IBM
> > notifications without ask for permission :(
> >
> >
> >
> > Could somebody register some fake mail address in the harmony-commits
to
> > use

> > it for my CC notifications or I should use other alias or may be other

> > options exist?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks, Vladimir
> >
> > By the way, now my CC reports for both systems:
> > Unit Test Error Details: (1)    Test:  test_Sign Class:
> > org.apache.harmony.xnet.tests.provider.jsse.DigitalSignatureTest
> > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError   at
> >
>

org.apache.harmony.xnet.tests.provider.jsse.DigitalSignatureTest.test_Sign

> > (
> > DigitalSignatureTest.java:135)   at
> > java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(Native Method)
>
>
> Hm, ... strange. The test passes for me on Linux and Windows.
>

> This is regression test for JSSE provider and it goes with a fix for the

> provider. So it can fail if CC doesn't perform classlib rebuild. And I
> believe it does.
>
> Is the failure stable for you? Can you reproduce it?
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan.
>
> On 11/15/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > 15.11.06, Gregory Shimansky<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> написал(а):
> > > > Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> > > > > Hello everyone,
> > > > > I started cruise control (stored in the "buildtest" module with
> > patch
> > > from
> > > > > issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
> > > > > Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb
HDD).
> > > > >

> > > > > On each platform cruise control runs (as separate projects in СС

> > > terms, all
> > > > > settings have default values):
> > > > > - build of classlib module (target: 'rebuild');
> > > > > - classlib tests on J9 VM (target 'test' in the classlib
module);
> > > > > - build of drlvm module (target: 'build');
> > > > > - vm tests (kernel+smoke+cunit, target: 'test' in the drlvm
> module);
> > > > > - classlib tests on DRL VM (target: 'test' in the classlib
module
> > with
> > > -
> > > > > Dtest.jre.home=drlvm);
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it OK to send my cruise control notifications to the
> > > harmony-commits
> > > > > list
> > > > > in order to notify about regressions?
> > > > >
> > > > > I suspect the notifications are not ideal but I will work on
their
> > > > > improvement upon precedents (false alarms) and your feedback
> > > >
> > > > I am +1 for cruise control and notifications to harmony-commit.
> > > >
> > > > But I wonder about linux version choice. If it is SuSE9, then
could
> we

> > > > upgrade it to SuSE10 or install another distribution like FC5 with

> gcc
> > > > 4.1.x? This will help a lot with compilation errors which gcc
3.3.3on
> > > > SuSE9 doesn't report.
> > > Good point, I support this.
> > > Alexey
>