On 11/15/06, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>
> Sorry, I can't use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail
address.
>
> Sorry again, to test it I use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] as for IBM
> notifications without ask for permission :(
>
>
>
> Could somebody register some fake mail address in the
harmony-commits to
> use
> it for my CC notifications or I should use other alias or may be other
> options exist?
>
>
>
> Thanks, Vladimir
>
> By the way, now my CC reports for both systems:
> Unit Test Error Details: (1) Test: test_Sign Class:
> org.apache.harmony.xnet.tests.provider.jsse.DigitalSignatureTest
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError at
>
org.apache.harmony.xnet.tests.provider.jsse.DigitalSignatureTest.test_Sign
> (
> DigitalSignatureTest.java:135) at
> java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(Native Method)
Hm, ... strange. The test passes for me on Linux and Windows.
This is regression test for JSSE provider and it goes with a fix for the
provider. So it can fail if CC doesn't perform classlib rebuild. And I
believe it does.
Is the failure stable for you? Can you reproduce it?
Thanks,
Stepan.
On 11/15/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 15.11.06, Gregory Shimansky<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> написал(а):
> > > Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > > I started cruise control (stored in the "buildtest" module with
> patch
> > from
> > > > issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
> > > > Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb
HDD).
> > > >
> > > > On each platform cruise control runs (as separate projects in СС
> > terms, all
> > > > settings have default values):
> > > > - build of classlib module (target: 'rebuild');
> > > > - classlib tests on J9 VM (target 'test' in the classlib module);
> > > > - build of drlvm module (target: 'build');
> > > > - vm tests (kernel+smoke+cunit, target: 'test' in the drlvm
module);
> > > > - classlib tests on DRL VM (target: 'test' in the classlib module
> with
> > -
> > > > Dtest.jre.home=drlvm);
> > > >
> > > > Is it OK to send my cruise control notifications to the
> > harmony-commits
> > > > list
> > > > in order to notify about regressions?
> > > >
> > > > I suspect the notifications are not ideal but I will work on
their
> > > > improvement upon precedents (false alarms) and your feedback
> > >
> > > I am +1 for cruise control and notifications to harmony-commit.
> > >
> > > But I wonder about linux version choice. If it is SuSE9, then could
we
> > > upgrade it to SuSE10 or install another distribution like FC5 with
gcc
> > > 4.1.x? This will help a lot with compilation errors which gcc
3.3.3on
> > > SuSE9 doesn't report.
> > Good point, I support this.
> > --
> > Alexey
> >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gregory
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Stepan Mishura
Intel Middleware Products Division
------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]