Seems, I was over-optimistic :( To test notifications I add my email together with ' [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and broke ws. But I received only 1 notification and seems it was for my address only.
Any ideas? Now I try to run it with notification from my gmail address. Thanks, Vlaidmir ---------------------------------------------------------------- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2006 12:12 PM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ivanov, Vladimir A *Subject:* [continuum] Win XP 1CPU msvc: classlib classlib Build Failed *Importance:* High BUILD FAILED Ant Error Message: C:\harm_cc\buildtest\trunk\cc\projects\classlib\trunk\build.xml:167: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\harm_cc\buildtest\trunk\cc\projects\classlib\trunk\make\build-test.xml:52: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\harm_cc\buildtest\trunk\cc\projects\classlib\trunk\make\properties.xml:266: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\harm_cc\buildtest\trunk\cc\projects\classlib\trunk\modules\accessibility\build.xml:175: Process fork failed. Date of build: 11/17/2006 11:56:13 Time to build: 15 minutes 22 seconds Last changed: 11/17/2006 09:58:31 Last log entry: Replace tabs with spaces, format a few sections On 11/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
please locally break something (IOW, no need to check in...), get CC to send the message, so then we can all rest comfortably that failures do lead to email. geir Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > Thanks, today this test passed on both machines :( I hope, the CC will send > notification if this test fail again. > > Now, notifications should be sending to harmony-commits list from the > [EMAIL PROTECTED] address. > > > > Thanks, Vladimir > > On 11/16/06, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 11/15/06, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: >> > >> > Sorry, I can't use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail >> address. >> > >> > Sorry again, to test it I use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] as for IBM >> > notifications without ask for permission :( >> > >> > >> > >> > Could somebody register some fake mail address in the >> harmony-commits to >> > use >> > it for my CC notifications or I should use other alias or may be other >> > options exist? >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks, Vladimir >> > >> > By the way, now my CC reports for both systems: >> > Unit Test Error Details: (1) Test: test_Sign Class: >> > org.apache.harmony.xnet.tests.provider.jsse.DigitalSignatureTest >> > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError at >> > >> org.apache.harmony.xnet.tests.provider.jsse.DigitalSignatureTest.test_Sign >> >> > ( >> > DigitalSignatureTest.java:135) at >> > java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(Native Method) >> >> >> Hm, ... strange. The test passes for me on Linux and Windows. >> >> This is regression test for JSSE provider and it goes with a fix for the >> provider. So it can fail if CC doesn't perform classlib rebuild. And I >> believe it does. >> >> Is the failure stable for you? Can you reproduce it? >> >> Thanks, >> Stepan. >> >> On 11/15/06, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > 15.11.06, Gregory Shimansky<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> написал(а): >> > > > Vladimir Ivanov wrote: >> > > > > Hello everyone, >> > > > > I started cruise control (stored in the "buildtest" module with >> > patch >> > > from >> > > > > issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes. >> > > > > Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb >> HDD). >> > > > > >> > > > > On each platform cruise control runs (as separate projects in СС >> > > terms, all >> > > > > settings have default values): >> > > > > - build of classlib module (target: 'rebuild'); >> > > > > - classlib tests on J9 VM (target 'test' in the classlib module); >> > > > > - build of drlvm module (target: 'build'); >> > > > > - vm tests (kernel+smoke+cunit, target: 'test' in the drlvm >> module); >> > > > > - classlib tests on DRL VM (target: 'test' in the classlib module >> > with >> > > - >> > > > > Dtest.jre.home=drlvm); >> > > > > >> > > > > Is it OK to send my cruise control notifications to the >> > > harmony-commits >> > > > > list >> > > > > in order to notify about regressions? >> > > > > >> > > > > I suspect the notifications are not ideal but I will work on >> their >> > > > > improvement upon precedents (false alarms) and your feedback >> > > > >> > > > I am +1 for cruise control and notifications to harmony-commit. >> > > > >> > > > But I wonder about linux version choice. If it is SuSE9, then could >> we >> > > > upgrade it to SuSE10 or install another distribution like FC5 with >> gcc >> > > > 4.1.x? This will help a lot with compilation errors which gcc >> 3.3.3on >> > > > SuSE9 doesn't report. >> > > Good point, I support this. >> > > -- >> > > Alexey >> > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Gregory >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Stepan Mishura >> Intel Middleware Products Division >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>
