Yes, exactly, but how does one call the way of programming without
monads / do notation then, explicitly passing the "object"? Does this
approach have a name? Or just "non-monadic style"?
Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
Actually I stopped bothering long ago about 'understanding monads'.
I think that's a shame, because when I wrote the source code myself
to get
from a pure functional approach (passing the "object" from function to
function as an extra argument) to a monadic approach,
where "monadic" is still "pure functional", but somehow tries to hide
that
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
