Peter Verswyvelen writes:
Yes, exactly, but how does one call the way of programming without monads
/ do notation then, explicitly passing the "object"? Does this approach
have a name? Or just "non-monadic style"?
In the jargon of CPS, somehow related to Monads, the constructions which
do not use continuations are often called in Direct Style. I think it can
be exported to Monads in general. State Monad in particular.
IO is different, you *cannot* make it non-monadic.
Jerzy Karczmarczuk
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
