Hello Simon, Wednesday, November 18, 2009, 12:17:31 PM, you wrote:
> You could argue that (a -> b -> b) is "doing more" than (a -> ()), if i correctly understand, we have two versions: 1) easier to use 2) more efficient and one of them may be defined via another? how about providing both versions, with simpler name for simpler version? -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulat.zigans...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
