On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Tuegel <ttue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Suppose we adopt your suggestion and let test programs be ordinary > executables in ordinary 'Executable' sections, and make 'Test' > sections that look like: > > > Test foo-1 > > exe-is: foo > > options: --enable-bar --disable-baz > > > > Test foo-2 > > exe-is: foo > > options: --enable-bar --enable-baz > > > > Test some-other-test > > exe-is: some-other-test > > options: --something-completely-different > > Now we get named sets of options but don't have to worry about parsing > through to find the executable names! It also solves the problem of > running test suites with multiple sets of options at runtime. >
Ah, I like this too, as well as Gregory's suggestion re: "Automatic" options. --Rogan > -- > Thomas Tuegel _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe