Re: more detailed explanation about forall in Haskell

[Ketil Malde]

Frank Atanassow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I agree, and I think it's hopeless. This is my last message to the Haskell
> list on the subject. There is nothing Haskell-specific any longer about this
> discussion.

Uh, I feel I'm a bit of a hobbyist on this list, but what exactly is
the relevance of all this?  Flipping through these messages, I feel I
have aquired some grasp of forall, but in what contexts is forall used 
in Haskell - can anybody point me to an URL that explains or
exemplifies?  

-kzm
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants