Theodore Norvell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > I've been following this discussion, but there are so many new buzzwords > coming out of microsoft that it's a bit confusing for those not > in the know. That's part of the masterplan ;-) > Is there a quick way to summarize the relationships > between > .NET > NGWS > C# (which I've discovered is intended to be pronounces C-sharp > rather than C-hash) > the .NET virtual machine > COM > Why does the world need C# when it already has Java and C++? A good analysis of were C# fits re Java and C++ is at http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/08/09/1612254&mode=thread Manuel
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Nigel Perry
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Theodore Norvell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Nigel Perry
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Claus Reinke
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Ketil Malde
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Florian Hars
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Keith Wansbrough
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Brent Fulgham
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Ketil Malde
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Doug Ransom
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Brent Fulgham
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Theodore Norvell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd