On 10-Aug-2000, Theodore Norvell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks to Nigel for answering my question > > Tyson Dowd wrote: > > > Microsoft indicates that C# will not support "genericity", through > > > even anything as crude as C++'s templates, so it is unlikely that > > > they will seek to support functional programming languages in the > > > short term. Perhaps this limitation is part of the impetus for the > > > Mondrian variant. Please be careful with attribution, I did not write that. -- Tyson Dowd # # Surreal humour isn't everyone's cup of fur. [EMAIL PROTECTED] # http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~trd #
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Ketil Malde
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Doug Ransom
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Brent Fulgham
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Theodore Norvell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Nigel Perry
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Benjamin Leon Russell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Byron Hale
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Antony Courtney
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Lyndon While
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Benjamin Leon Russell