On 10-Aug-2000, Theodore Norvell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to Nigel for answering my question
>
> Tyson Dowd wrote:
> > > Microsoft indicates that C# will not support "genericity", through
> > > even anything as crude as C++'s templates, so it is unlikely that
> > > they will seek to support functional programming languages in the
> > > short term. Perhaps this limitation is part of the impetus for the
> > > Mondrian variant.
Please be careful with attribution, I did not write that.
--
Tyson Dowd #
# Surreal humour isn't everyone's cup of fur.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] #
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~trd #
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Ketil Malde
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Doug Ransom
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Brent Fulgham
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Theodore Norvell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Nigel Perry
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Benjamin Leon Russell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Byron Hale
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Antony Courtney
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Lyndon While
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Benjamin Leon Russell
