2009/8/19 Yosef Kreinin <yossi.krei...@mobileye.com>: > C++ FQA Lite barely scratches the surface. It's based on C++ FAQ Lite which > for some reason or other contains almost no items on things like overload > resolution which alone could easily quadruple its size.
I wonder whether this is fallout from the fact that the C++ FAQ is not, in fact, a list of questions that *are* frequently asked, but one of questions that, in the authors' opinion, *should* be asked. (Or at least it was so the last time I took at look at the thing, which was - admittedly - several years ago.) Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton <philip.new...@gmail.com>
