Works for me. +1

Only question is do we want to back-port HBASE-613 or should that go into 0.1.4?

---
Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset


> -----Original Message-----
> From: stack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 9:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 3 [WAS -> Re:
> hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 2]
>
> Michael Bieniosek reports I'd mangled release candidate 2.
>
> Here is release candidate 3:
>
>  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-3/
>
> Please take it for a spin.  Voting (again) closes Friday, June 20th.
>
> This release only runs on hadoop 0.16.x.
>
> Yours,
> HBase Team
>
>
> stack wrote:
> > Here's a new 0.1.3 release candidate:
> >
> >  http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-2/
> >
> > Please try it out.  Voting closes Friday, June 20th.
> >
> > (Candidate 1 was squashed because a couple of more fixes came in:
> > HBASE-680, HBASE-684, and HBASE-686)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > The HBase Team
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.0/1509 - Release
> Date: 6/19/2008 8:00 AM
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1510 - Release Date: 6/19/2008 3:21 
PM

Reply via email to