+1

Ran hbase torture test, checked out documentation, and ran unit tests.

St.Ack


stack wrote:
Release candidate 4 was voted down because HBASE-613 needed more attention and because we weren't splitting under loads if a schema with many families: HBASE-707. We also found a deadlock, HBASE-709 and another area in which we were susceptible to (very) bad clock skew: HBASE-710. All these issues have been fixed in the new candidate.

Release candidate 5 is available for download here:

http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-5/

Please try it out and let us know if any issues.

Known issues: HBASE-713 Onlining/Offlining of tables is not reliable on biggish tables (hundreds of regions).

Lets make the voting period short, tomorrow, Friday, June 26th.

The HBase Team



stack wrote:
Release candidate 4 adds a fix for HBASE-613:

http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-4/

Please try it and let us know if issues. Voting closes on Tuesday, June 24th.

Thanks,
Your HBase Team


stack wrote:
Michael Bieniosek reports I'd mangled release candidate 2.

Here is release candidate 3:

http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-3/

Please take it for a spin.  Voting (again) closes Friday, June 20th.

This release only runs on hadoop 0.16.x.

Yours,
HBase Team


stack wrote:
Here's a new 0.1.3 release candidate:

 http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-2/

Please try it out.  Voting closes Friday, June 20th.

(Candidate 1 was squashed because a couple of more fixes came in: HBASE-680, HBASE-684, and HBASE-686)

Thanks,

The HBase Team




Reply via email to