Is 613 a bug in 0.1 branch? If so, lets squash the candidate and
include it.
St.Ack
Jim Kellerman wrote:
Works for me. +1
Only question is do we want to back-port HBASE-613 or should that go into 0.1.4?
---
Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
-----Original Message-----
From: stack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 9:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 3 [WAS -> Re:
hbase-0.1.3 release candidate 2]
Michael Bieniosek reports I'd mangled release candidate 2.
Here is release candidate 3:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-3/
Please take it for a spin. Voting (again) closes Friday, June 20th.
This release only runs on hadoop 0.16.x.
Yours,
HBase Team
stack wrote:
Here's a new 0.1.3 release candidate:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.3-candidate-2/
Please try it out. Voting closes Friday, June 20th.
(Candidate 1 was squashed because a couple of more fixes came in:
HBASE-680, HBASE-684, and HBASE-686)
Thanks,
The HBase Team
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.0/1509 - Release
Date: 6/19/2008 8:00 AM
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1510 - Release Date: 6/19/2008 3:21
PM
