Hi Colin, It is great to hear that you agree to keep HDFS-2246. Please as well address my comments posted on HDFS-347 and let me know once you have posted a new patch on HDFS-347. Thanks a lot!
BTW, you should conclude the VOTE you started and use a separated thread for other discussion as Suresh mentioned earlier. I hope you could use our convention on voting. Otherwise, it is hard for others to follow. Tsz-Wo ________________________________ From: Suresh Srinivas <sur...@hortonworks.com> To: "hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 5:09 AM Subject: Re: VOTE: HDFS-347 merge Thanks Colin. Will check it out as soon as I can. On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@alumni.cmu.edu>wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Suresh Srinivas <sur...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Suresh, if you're willing to "support and maintain" HDFS-2246, do you > >> have cycles to propose a patch to the HDFS-347 branch reintegrating > >> HDFS-2246 with the simplifications you outlined? In your review, did > >> you find anything else you'd like to address prior to the merge, or is > >> this the only item? -C > > > > > > Yes, I can work on adding HDFS-2246 back in HDFS-347 branch. I will get > to > > it > > in a week or two, if that is okay. > > > > I have not looked at the patch closely. But I think any issues found > could > > be fixed in trunk and should not block the merge. > > Hi Suresh, > > HDFS-4538 adds the ability to use the old block reader in the HDFS-347 > branch. Check it out. > > Colin > -- http://hortonworks.com/download/
