> > > There's no reason to maintain multiple implementations of the same > feature, that's why per the 2246 jira it was proposed as a "good short > term solution till HDFS-347 is completed". Why is ATM's compromise > unacceptable? >
We have already discussed this. Here is the recap: HDFS-347 does not support all the platforms. HDFS-2246 does. So removing HDFS-2246 does not make sense unless HDFS-347 supports all the platforms. I am not arguing we should retain HDFS-2246 forever. I do not currently have bandwidth to add HDFS-347 windows equivalent functionality. When I or someone else adds support for that we can discuss removing HDFS-2246. Until then I can support HDFS-2246 mechanism. I have also proposed how to make the current patch simpler where both the features can live together. I will change my vote to +1 in following two cases. 1. HDFS-347 supports all the other platforms HDFS-2246 supported and hence truly becomes replacement. 2. Do not remove HDFS-2246 support. BTW I think we should switch to some other thread given this merge vote is already past 7 days. -- http://hortonworks.com/download/