Thanks Eric. Sounds good. I may try to see if I can do the branching/RC
sooner.

--Yongjun

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Eric Badger <ebad...@oath.com> wrote:

> My thinking is to cut the branch in next couple of days and create RC for
> vote at the end of month.
>   >  We plan to cut branch-3.0.3 by the coming Wednesday (May 9th) and
> vote for RC on May 30th
>   I much prefer to wait to cut the branch until just before the production
> of the release and the vote. With so many branches, we sometimes miss
> putting critical bug fixes in unreleased branches if the    branch is cut
> too early.
>
> Echoing Eric Payne, I think we should wait to cut the branch until we are
> actually creating the RC to vote on (i.e. on May 29 or 30 if the vote is to
> be on May 30).
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Yongjun Zhang <yzh...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have gardened the jiras for 3.0.3, and have the following open issues:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12343970
>>
>> Two of them are blockers, one of them (YARN-8346) has already got +1 for
>> patch, the other (YARN-8108) will take longer time to resolve and it seems
>> we can possibly push it to next release given 3.0.2 also has the issue.
>>
>> My thinking is to cut the branch in next couple of days and create RC for
>> vote at the end of month.
>>
>> Comments are welcome.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Yongjun
>>
>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Vrushali C <vrushalic2...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for including the YARN-7190 patch in 3.0.3 release. This is a fix
>> that
>> > will enable HBase to use Hadoop 3.0.x in the production line.
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > Vrushali
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Yongjun Zhang <yzh...@cloudera.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thanks Wei-Chiu and Haibo for the feedback!
>> >>
>> >> Good thing is that I have made the following note couple of days ago
>> when
>> >> I
>> >> looked the at branch diff, so we are on the same page:
>> >>
>> >>      496dc57 Revert "YARN-7190. Ensure only NM classpath in 2.x gets
>> TSv2
>> >> related hbase jars, not the user classpath. Contributed by Varun
>> Saxena."
>> >>
>> >> *YARN-7190 is not in 3.0.2,  I will include it in 3.0.3 per* the
>> comment
>> >> below:
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7190?focusedComme
>> >> ntId=16457649&
>> >> page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels
>> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7190?focusedComm
>> entId=16457649&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels>
>>
>> >> :
>> >> comment-tabpanel#comment-16457649
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> In addition, I will revert   https://issues.apache.org/
>> >> jira/browse/HADOOP-13055 from 3.0.3 since it's a feature.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >>
>> >> --Yongjun
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Haibo Chen <haiboc...@cloudera.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > +1 on adding YARN-7190 to Hadoop 3.0.x despite the fact that it is
>> >> > technically incompatible.
>> >> > It is critical enough to justify being an exception, IMO.
>> >> >
>> >> > Added Rohith and Vrushali
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 6:20 AM, Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@apache.org>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Thanks Yongjun for driving 3.0.3 release!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> IMHO, could we consider adding YARN-7190
>> >> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7190> into the list?
>> >> >> I understand that it is listed as an incompatible change, however,
>> >> because
>> >> >> of this bug, HBase considers the entire Hadoop 3.0.x line not
>> >> production
>> >> >> ready. I feel there's not much point releasing any more 3.0.x
>> releases
>> >> if
>> >> >> downstream projects can't pick it up (after the fact that HBase is
>> one
>> >> of
>> >> >> the most important projects around Hadoop).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Yongjun Zhang <yzh...@cloudera.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi Eric,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks for the feedback, good point. I will try to clean up
>> things,
>> >> then
>> >> >> > cut branch before the release production and vote.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Best,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --Yongjun
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 8:39 AM, Eric Payne <
>> eric.payne1...@yahoo.com
>> >> .
>> >> >> > invalid
>> >> >> > > wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > > >  We plan to cut branch-3.0.3 by the coming Wednesday (May 9th)
>> >> and
>> >> >> vote
>> >> >> > > for RC on May 30th
>> >> >> > > I much prefer to wait to cut the branch until just before the
>> >> >> production
>> >> >> > > of the release and the vote. With so many branches, we sometimes
>> >> miss
>> >> >> > > putting critical bug fixes in unreleased branches if the branch
>> is
>> >> cut
>> >> >> > too
>> >> >> > > early.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > My 2 cents...
>> >> >> > > Thanks,
>> >> >> > > -Eric Payne
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > On Monday, May 7, 2018, 12:09:00 AM CDT, Yongjun Zhang <
>> >> >> > > yjzhan...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Hi All,
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > We have released Apache Hadoop 3.0.2 in April of this year [1].
>> >> Since
>> >> >> > then,
>> >> >> > > there are quite some commits done to branch-3.0. To further
>> improve
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> > > quality of release, we plan to do 3.0.3 release now. The focus
>> of
>> >> >> 3.0.3
>> >> >> > > will be fixing blockers (3), critical bugs (17) and bug fixes
>> >> (~130),
>> >> >> see
>> >> >> > > [2].
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Usually no new feature should be included for maintenance
>> >> releases, I
>> >> >> > > noticed we have https://issues.apache.org/jira
>> /browse/HADOOP-13055
>> >> in
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > > branch classified as new feature. I will talk with the
>> developers
>> >> to
>> >> >> see
>> >> >> > if
>> >> >> > > we should include it in 3.0.3.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > I also noticed that there are more commits in the branch than
>> can
>> >> be
>> >> >> > found
>> >> >> > > by query [2], also some commits committed to 3.0.3 do not have
>> >> their
>> >> >> jira
>> >> >> > > target release field filled in accordingly. I will go through
>> them
>> >> to
>> >> >> > > update the jira.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > We plan to cut branch-3.0.3 by the coming Wednesday (May 9th)
>> and
>> >> vote
>> >> >> > for
>> >> >> > > RC on May 30th, targeting for Jun 8th release.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > Your insights are welcome.
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/g
>> ene...@hadoop.apache.org/msg07
>> >> >> 790.html
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12343874
>> See
>> >> >> Note
>> >> >> > > below
>> >> >> > > Note: seems I need some admin change so that I can make the
>> filter
>> >> in
>> >> >> [2]
>> >> >> > > public, I'm working on that. For now, you can use jquery
>> >> >> > > (project = hadoop OR project = "Hadoop HDFS" OR project =
>> "Hadoop
>> >> >> YARN"
>> >> >> > OR
>> >> >> > > project = "Hadoop Map/Reduce") AND fixVersion in (3.0.3) ORDER
>> BY
>> >> >> > priority
>> >> >> > > DESC
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > Thanks and best regards,
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > --Yongjun
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> ---------
>> >> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-unsubscribe@hado
>> >> op.apache.org
>> >> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: mapreduce-dev-h...@hadoop.apac
>> >> he.org
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> A very happy Hadoop contributor
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to