> Chao can you use the one that Steve mentioned in the mail?

Hmm how do I do that? Typically after closing the RC in nexus the
release bits will show up in
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/hadoop
and Spark build will be able to pick them up for testing. However in
this case I don't see any 3.3.3 jars in the URL.

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 6:24 PM Ayush Saxena <ayush...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There were two 3.3.3 staged. The earlier one was with skipShade, the date was 
> also april 22, I archived that. Chao can you use the one that Steve mentioned 
> in the mail?
>
> On Sat, 7 May 2022 at 06:18, Chao Sun <sunc...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Seems there are some issues with the shaded client as I was not able
>> to compile Apache Spark with the RC
>> (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36474). Looks like it's compiled
>> with the `-DskipShade` option and the hadoop-client-api JAR doesn't
>> contain any class:
>>
>> ➜  hadoop-client-api jar tf 3.3.3/hadoop-client-api-3.3.3.jar
>> META-INF/
>> META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>> META-INF/NOTICE.txt
>> META-INF/LICENSE.txt
>> META-INF/maven/
>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.hadoop/
>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.hadoop/hadoop-client-api/
>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.hadoop/hadoop-client-api/pom.xml
>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.hadoop/hadoop-client-api/pom.properties
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 4:24 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> >   * Signature: ok
>> >   * Checksum : passed
>> >   * Rat check (1.8.0_191): passed
>> >    - mvn clean apache-rat:check
>> >   * Built from source (1.8.0_191): failed
>> >    - mvn clean install  -DskipTests
>> >    - mvn -fae --no-transfer-progress -DskipTests -Dmaven.javadoc.skip=true
>> > -Pnative -Drequire.openssl -Drequire.snappy -Drequire.valgrind
>> > -Drequire.zstd -Drequire.test.libhadoop clean install
>> >   * Unit tests pass (1.8.0_191):
>> >     - HDFS Tests passed (Didn't run more than this).
>> >
>> > Deployed a ten node ha hdfs cluster with three namenodes and five
>> > journalnodes. Ran a ten node hbase (older version of 2.5 branch built
>> > against 3.3.2) against it. Tried a small verification job. Good. Ran a
>> > bigger job with mild chaos. All seems to be working properly (recoveries,
>> > logs look fine). Killed a namenode. Failover worked promptly. UIs look
>> > good. Poked at the hdfs cli. Seems good.
>> >
>> > S
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 4:24 AM Steve Loughran <ste...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I have put together a release candidate (rc0) for Hadoop 3.3.3
>> > >
>> > > The RC is available at:
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hadoop/3.3.3-RC0/
>> > >
>> > > The git tag is release-3.3.3-RC0, commit d37586cbda3
>> > >
>> > > The maven artifacts are staged at
>> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1348/
>> > >
>> > > You can find my public key at:
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hadoop/common/KEYS
>> > >
>> > > Change log
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hadoop/3.3.3-RC0/CHANGELOG.md
>> > >
>> > > Release notes
>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hadoop/3.3.3-RC0/RELEASENOTES.md
>> > >
>> > > There's a very small number of changes, primarily critical code/packaging
>> > > issues and security fixes.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >    - The critical fixes which shipped in the 3.2.3 release.
>> > >    -  CVEs in our code and dependencies
>> > >    - Shaded client packaging issues.
>> > >    - A switch from log4j to reload4j
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > reload4j is an active fork of the log4j 1.17 library with the classes 
>> > > which
>> > > contain CVEs removed. Even though hadoop never used those classes, they
>> > > regularly raised alerts on security scans and concen from users. 
>> > > Switching
>> > > to the forked project allows us to ship a secure logging framework. It 
>> > > will
>> > > complicate the builds of downstream maven/ivy/gradle projects which 
>> > > exclude
>> > > our log4j artifacts, as they need to cut the new dependency instead/as
>> > > well.
>> > >
>> > > See the release notes for details.
>> > >
>> > > This is my first release through the new docker build process, do please
>> > > validate artifact signing &c to make sure it is good. I'll be trying 
>> > > builds
>> > > of downstream projects.
>> > >
>> > > We know there are some outstanding issues with at least one library we 
>> > > are
>> > > shipping (okhttp), but I don't want to hold this release up for it. If 
>> > > the
>> > > docker based release process works smoothly enough we can do a followup
>> > > security release in a few weeks.
>> > >
>> > > Please try the release and vote. The vote will run for 5 days.
>> > >
>> > > -Steve
>> > >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to