[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034863#comment-13034863
 ] 

Suresh Srinivas commented on HDFS-1936:
---------------------------------------

BTW I did not describe this earlier - I am removing the check for LV while 
consuming operations from editlog. Opcodes are suppose to be unique (at least 
that is the case right now) and there is no need to check for LV when the 
opcode was added.

This simplifies some of the conflict you might have been thinking about. Please 
look at the patch.



> Updating the layout version from HDFS-1822 causes upgrade problems.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-1936
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1936
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: name-node
>    Affects Versions: 0.22.0, 0.23.0
>            Reporter: Suresh Srinivas
>            Assignee: Suresh Srinivas
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.22.0, 0.23.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-1936.22.patch, HDFS-1936.trunk.patch
>
>
> In HDFS-1822 and HDFS-1842, the layout versions for 203, 204, 22 and trunk 
> were changed. Some of the namenode logic that depends on layout version is 
> broken because of this. Read the comment for more description.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to