[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13876674#comment-13876674
 ] 

Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-5709:
---------------------------------

Thanks Andrew! The new patch looks good to me, +1. The only suggestion is that 
maybe we do not need the following preconditions check since we already check 
every component in renameReservedComponentOnUpgrade
{code}
+      Preconditions.checkArgument(DFSUtil.isValidName(newPath),
+          "Renamed path " + newPath + " is not a valid"
+          + " name. Please verify the value of "
+          + DFSConfigKeys.DFS_NAMENODE_UPGRADE_RENAME_RESERVED_SNAPSHOT);
{code}

> Improve upgrade with existing files and directories named ".snapshot"
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-5709
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5709
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Andrew Wang
>            Assignee: Andrew Wang
>              Labels: snapshots, upgrade
>         Attachments: hdfs-5709-1.patch, hdfs-5709-2.patch, hdfs-5709-3.patch
>
>
> Right now in trunk, upgrade fails messily if the old fsimage or edits refer 
> to a directory named ".snapshot". We should at least print a better error 
> message (which I believe was the original intention in HDFS-4666), and [~atm] 
> proposed automatically renaming these files and directories.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to