[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14126218#comment-14126218
]
Chris Douglas commented on HDFS-6940:
-------------------------------------
bq. Committers do need to stick to the areas where they are familiar
demonstrated by their contributions. It is an unwritten rule, based on honor
system.
Cos's +1 is valid; he's a committer on the Hadoop project, period. He does not
require your consent to participate in these discussions.
bq. Your veto is not argumented technically, besides being late.
Committed patches are not immune to vetos, and this is obviously a technical
difference in opinion. [~shv], could you please revert this from trunk and
branch-2 while you work out an interface that everyone can live with?
> Initial refactoring to allow ConsensusNode implementation
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6940
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: namenode
> Affects Versions: 2.0.6-alpha, 2.5.0
> Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
> Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko
> Fix For: 2.6.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-6940.patch
>
>
> Minor refactoring of FSNamesystem to open private methods that are needed for
> CNode implementation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
