On 16.11.2012 17:00, Martin Decky wrote: > I definitively plan something, probably a "state of the union" kind of > talk. However, I am still waiting for any conclusions whether we should > prepare individual uncoordinated talks or rather have some common strategy.
Uncoordinated in this context would mean that we just prepare something in total secrecy, don't tell the others what it is and then simply present it in Brussels. I don't think this will be the case. Any other scenario is a coordinated one :-) > My idea would be to have a longer talk about the history of HelenOS, > major achievements of HelenOS, current hot topics and future directions. > But this is too much for a single 45 minute talk, it should be divided > into multiple parts, possibly presented by more people. On the other > hand, although each part will be presented by one person, the content > and slides should be created in collaboration. What do you think? Yeah, I like this idea. The constituent talks could be even shorter, like 30 minutes if needed. Definitely should not come in one block nor in an uninterrupted sequence of HelenOS talks to better mix with the other content. Let's break your suggestion into a list of points: - history of HelenOS - major achievements of HelenOS How much would this resemble or duplicate my last years talk? I mean duplicating some of the message may or may not be a good thing, depending on whether we assume the visitors will be the same, different and whether they could potentially read the last year's slides themselves. - current hot topics - future directions. I'm thinking of adding: - mistakes that we have made during the years and how we fixed them Jakub _______________________________________________ HelenOS-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.modry.cz/cgi-bin/listinfo/helenos-devel
