Dear all, a lot of thanks for all the hints and suggestions.
In the end we have selected the PINE64 as it really seems as a more reasonable choice. I will try to keep you updated (at the moment we are waiting for the delivery). Thank you & take care, - Vojta 20. 3. 2025 12:46:36 Martin Decky <[email protected]>: > Dear Vojta, > > I also don't have any direct experience with either of the two boards, but I > second with Jirka that it should be less likely to hit a roadblock in case of > Quartz64, given the open source friendly nature of PINE64. > > It is also a more powerful and more recent 64-bit hardware, the CPU of NanoPi > is more than a decade old by now. Those are more reasons to favor the > Quartz64, in my opinion. > > I didn't examine the official U-Boot for Quartz64, but it should be even > possible to reuse the existing UEFI infrastructure implemented for HiKey960 > via the "bootefi" command. > > > M.D. > > _______________________________________________ > HelenOS-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.modry.cz/listinfo/helenos-devel _______________________________________________ HelenOS-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.modry.cz/listinfo/helenos-devel
