On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Bob Rossi wrote: > > Again, the following seems more intuitive to me now: > > > > %define push_pull "pull" // default > > %define push_pull "push" > > %define push_pull "both" > > > > > > You can use %pure-parser in combination with either %push-parser or > > > > %push-pull-parser. > > OK, as of today, I'm going to document push-parser, push-pull-parser and > pure-parser in combination with those two. It seemed that perhaps you > were thinking about reimplementing how this works. Are you?
Updating your documentation should just be a search-and-replace: %push-parser --> %define push_pull "push" %push-pull-parser --> %define push_pull "both" We might also want to note that the default is: %define push_pull "pull" > I just don't want to document this if you think you'll change it > shortly. I'll try to get to it sometime this week, but I'm thinking it won't change your documentation much anyway. _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison