On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 08:50:32PM -0400, Joel E. Denny wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Bob Rossi wrote: > > > > Again, the following seems more intuitive to me now: > > > > > > %define push_pull "pull" // default > > > %define push_pull "push" > > > %define push_pull "both" > > > > > > > > You can use %pure-parser in combination with either %push-parser or > > > > > %push-pull-parser. > > > > OK, as of today, I'm going to document push-parser, push-pull-parser and > > pure-parser in combination with those two. It seemed that perhaps you > > were thinking about reimplementing how this works. Are you? > > Updating your documentation should just be a search-and-replace: > > %push-parser --> %define push_pull "push" > %push-pull-parser --> %define push_pull "both" > > We might also want to note that the default is: > > %define push_pull "pull"
OK, I understand. I guess I don't even have enough experience with bison to know what %define means. I'll look into it... > > I just don't want to document this if you think you'll change it > > shortly. > > I'll try to get to it sometime this week, but I'm thinking it won't change > your documentation much anyway. OK! I'm working on the documentation this week. I can't procrastinate any longer! Bob Rossi _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison