On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > (2) Nested namespaces do not work:
> > %prefix=abc::def should give
> >
> > namespace abc {
> > namespace def {
> > ..
> > }
> > }
> >
> > instead of
> >
> > namespace abc::def {
> > ..
> > }
> >
> > I guess?
> >
> >
> > Is this known and planned to fix?
>
> That was not an expected feature, but I see Joel picks up the
> ball :)
Well, maybe I didn't think it through.
> If we start "parsing" namespace names, we will have a million
> new questions to answer. What is the output of "::foo",
I figured the namespace name is meant to be relative to the global
namespace, so a leading "::" is implicit if not specified.
> "foo::", etc.?
This seems like an error to me.
Other than that, isn't it just a matter of splitting on "::"? Am I
forgetting something?
_______________________________________________
help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
