> On 7 Sep 2023, at 19:01, Domingo Alvarez Duarte <mingo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I already know about that grammar and it's already there as "Cxx parser (not > working)" because it uses "error" and auxiliary code to parse "C++" and the > parser I'm using right now doesn't support "error" and at first it's mostly > declarative only, anyway as the time goes by probably other ways to achieve > the same can arrive.
So your Cxx is not this one: https://github.com/dtolnay/cxx
