Hello Hans !
No ti isn't, I can't find any C++ grammar on https://github.com/dtolnay/cxx
Cheers !
On 7/9/23 20:14, Hans Åberg wrote:
On 7 Sep 2023, at 19:01, Domingo Alvarez Duarte <mingo...@gmail.com> wrote:
I already know about that grammar and it's already there as "Cxx parser (not working)" because it uses
"error" and auxiliary code to parse "C++" and the parser I'm using right now doesn't support
"error" and at first it's mostly declarative only, anyway as the time goes by probably other ways to achieve
the same can arrive.
So your Cxx is not this one:
https://github.com/dtolnay/cxx
