Another problem with the code in the branch is that it uses Commons Logging, whereas the code in the trunk uses SLF4J.
On 9/20/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My point is that the directory structure doesn't match that of the > trunk, so it will be very difficult to merge the changes from the > HQL_ANTLR_2 branch back in (I'm no SVN expert, so I may be mistaken > here). So, I guess I can copy your work from the HQL_ANTLR_2 branch > into my local copy of the trunk. That way, when I submit a patch, it > can be easily applied to the trunk. > > On 9/20/07, Steve Ebersole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 20 September 2007 11:25:00 am James Carman wrote: > > > Well, how difficult would it be to get the HQL_ANTLR_2 branch > > > mavenized so that it mimics the layout of the trunk? Wouldn't that > > > branch, as it currently sits, be very difficult to merge back into the > > > trunk? Could we make a copy of the trunk to another branch so that we > > > can copy over your changes into it (I can't do that because I don't > > > have write permissions)? Then, we can work on that mavenized branch. > > > > Why would it be difficult to merge changes back in? > > > > Work off trunk if you feel more comfortable with that. I'm not pointing out > > my branch implying that you work there. I merely point it out to illustrate > > imo beneficial changes. > > > > I don't really see the need for a branch quite honestly exactly because you > > do > > not have commit permissions. As long as the final diff is an svn diff (or > > you remember the repo revision number you checked out) we'll be fine. > > > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev